So the spammers have found this blog. This weekend I received 200 spam-messages in the comments. To keep the stresslevels of both me and the server low, Peet turned on the well-known little application that checks if you’re human and are able to read in a humanly way when leaving a comment. I’m sorry I have to do that.

Is it a coincidence that the spam began immediately after I blogged Blogonomics, and linked web-log.nl? I don’t think so. In a lot of senses it so predictable. (So bloggers using blogsoftware who until now did not have to fight comment-spam: do not link to commercial stuff…).

And yes, the comment-spam is in some way intelligent. It understand that I also use Dutch (if I remember well there was a bit of Dutch in the spam). It understands that I blog “intellectual” stuff (“Man your blog is so cognitive”). But I can spot the spam: URLs ending with .pl cannot be trusted without thinking twice. Sorry Poland.

The fight against spam can only be seen in terms of war.

How can blogs primarily be seen and conceptualized as conversations, when the comments-functionality is always on the brink of being destroyed by spammers? (When leaving a comment I prefer not to type over a few dancing letters or numbers; when managing my blog I prefer not to have to spend minutes or more on fighting spam).

And, now that we’re on this topic: at the moment I do have quite a problem with spam. It seems that some people do not receive my mail when it’s send from my normal mail-adress (that I have been using since 1997). Very annoying. (So: if you have send me mail and did not receive a reply, it is possible that I did write a reply that ended up in the spambox of your mail).

This happened to me as well when organizing Sonic Acts: every day I had to wade through the spambox to find the mails of Kim Cascone and Greg Kurcewicz.

First spent time revisiting blog-theory anno 2002 (like Rebecca Blood’s The Weblog Handbook: http://www.rebeccablood.net/handbook/). I made some notes on yellow post-its.

Then went through folders on my harddisk in which I have stored webpages and pdfs ‘to read’; re-ordered the contents (I now have 4 different research folders), deleted some, printed the papers I really want/have to read this week.

After that I made an old-fashioned links-page, and visited (quickly) about 100 (?), 200 (?) blogs to see if I want to include them on this page (for further reference, to remember). I worked through VoodooPad-documents in which I had saved links, went though the linkslist of my ‘old’ blog, followed links on blogs that I was happy to revisit or rediscover, and, most importantly, used my own memory. I still have to go through the bookmark-files of both Firefox and Safari — I only bookmarks when I’m too lazy to do more than hit ‘command-D’ (so the bookmark-lists tends to be long and totally unorganized).

Will this compulsion to order lead anywhere?

I never really go to use delicious/ariealt. Although I do use the delicious-accounts of others, often to good result. What one uses or not, has a lot to do with, well, preferences. (What you like, what you’re good at, what fits your use if time and working methodology, how important design is, how important good writing, etc.).

I also don’t use RSS. (My blog does RSS though, and I know some people appreciate that). I used RSS for a while when I spent much time on trains. Before catching a train I would boot my RSS-reader, let the feeds stream onto my harddisk, to browse through on the train. RSS was / is a way to have online content when there’s no connection. (I hated blogs that only put a headline plus a lead in the RSS, or worse, only a headline). What I miss in RSS is the personality of the design, the typography, all that (subtle? — hopefully) visual stuff that adds to the ‘voice’ of the site.

Wrt design: there is a strange attraction to making all texts look the same: have it shown in the stylesheet / template of your choice. (But basically RSS-readers and services like Bloglines (http://www.bloglines.com/) do not really look attractive).

I am put-off by really bad design. (That’s what I learned from visiting 100 blogs tonight, and quickly closing those which looked really ugly). But I’m not put off by generic Blogger/Wordpress/MoveableType-templates, as long as they are (a bit) clear.

Links-page and notes to come…

Here’s some of what I printed to read:
http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/.

‘Man hat, kurz gesagt, damals entdeckt, daß man die Welt weder einfach anzusehen, noch sie zu beschreiben hat, sondern daß man sie kalkulieren muß, wenn es darum geht, sie in den Griff zu bekommen, sie zu begreifen. Die Welt ist zwar unvorstellbar und unbeschreiblich, dafür aber kalkulierbar.’ p. 273

Vilém Flusser, ‘Digitaler Schein’, in Schriften, Band I, Lob der Oberflächlichkeit, für eine Phänomenologie der Medien, Bollmann, Mannheim, 1995.

‘Nicht werd Objekte besitzt (Rohmaterial, Industriekomplexe, Waffen), sondern wer Programme ausarbeitet und verbreitet, beherrscht die Gesellschaft (“Informationsimperialismus”).

‘Hoffnungsvoll and der Computerkunst ist nicht der Umstand, daß dabei etwas Schönes herauskommt — oder wie immer wir den Begriff “Kunst” fassen mögen –, sondern daß dabei Apparate tatsächlich von individuellen Menschen für ihre indivduellen Zwecke programmiert werden. Diese Menschen zwingen den Apparat, etwas zu tun (..) was nicht im Programm steht. Sie zwingen ihn, etwas von sinenen Herstellern nicht Vorgesehenes, etwas Unerwartenes zu machen. Unvorgesehene, unerwartenen Situationen heißen “Informationen.”.’ p. 261

Vilém Flusser, ‘Kunst und Computer’ in Schriften, Band I, Lob der Oberflächlichkeit, für eine Phänomenologie der Medien, Bollmann, Mannheim, 1995.

‘”(K)omputieren” (ist) ein Versuch (…) zerschmetterte Dinge laut Programm umzuformen.’

Vilém Flusser, ‘Komputieren’, in Schriften, Band I, Lob der Oberflächlichkeit, für eine Phänomenologie der Medien, Bollmann, Mannheim, 1995.

I’m enjoying it: tinkering & tweaking the .css-files of the wordpress-themes. Really. But what I do not get is why I should lose all of the whitespace in the lefthand margin of the content-part when I delete the one line that tells items in the righthand sidebar to get a 1px underlining when they happen to be a link… Makes no sense at all. I might not be a css-wizard, but I’m not stupid either. I can even look up and find out if it’s not something in the php. Makes me wonder: what does this blog look like on a windows-machine… Makes me wonder as well: why do people make such a mess of the css-files? It’s chock-full of lines that are not used… Maybe it’s the theme I’m using? Might be. Tomorrow I’ll tinker with another theme. Because it is fun.

How software softly ‘tells’ you how to write. It doesn’t impose, oh no, it just suggests… why wouldn’t you write like this, that’ll be best… don’t you think?

I do not like those suggestions.

That’s why I already have a love-hate relationship with WordPress.

‘Write Post’ suggests, softly, that I write short posts. Like of about 12 lines. The major part of the screen of my 12”-powerbook is taken by the rest of the interface (which is clear enough, no reason for severe criticism). The box for writing is 12 lines long. Of course I can write as much as I want. Of course I can change whatever I’d like to change. But that’s not the point. How many people actually change the default? And besides that: one needs room for the other elements of the interface as well.

The point is how the software (and how it is presented) programs a certain kind of writing. Short posts. Categorized. And writing a short post means that you’re trying to be concise and clear. The act of categorizing installs database-thinking. Consciously or unconsciously, maybe even secretly you are writing for an interlinked and searchable database.

Of course, that is what you are doing anyway. At least, seen from the perspective of a machine. In case you are using bloggingsoftware like WordPress, you are filling a MySQL-database with categorized data. But also if you’re doing everything by hand, old-skool, you are filling the database of the search engines.

But there is a difference (is there?) When writing old-skool in BBedit, using simple HTML, you are constructing a sequence. You are in a flux of time, writing is keeping track of time, it just goes on and on, one post comes after the other.

When using WordPress, or a similar package, your posts may be, by default, presented in a chronological way, yet when writing and categorizing the post, there is much more of a database-feeling. You store your thoughts and notes away, putting them in boxes. Feels more like filing (note: with one ‘l’).

Maybe this is a good analogy. Using WordPress is more like writing notes on filing cards and putting the cards in a box. That is a very specific way (and genre) of writing. Writing, to state that again, is for me more like a flux.

The fact that I first click ‘write post’, then write, then — inside the same interface first choose some categories and then click ‘save’ or ‘publish’, helps the feeling of ‘filing’.

What I like about blogging, (or what I used to like about blogging?) is that it stresses writing as an ongoing activity, the flux.

That does not go very well together with filling filing cards, tagging them in multiple ways, and storing them in boxes.

Anyway, in a sense this also comes down to the by now classic ‘trope’ that computer-writing (hypertext et cetera), is spatial. (Does it?)

Personal note 1: Using filing cards — as a research method — never worked out for me. I have my notebook, I have multiple text-documents in folders on my harddisk, all drafts and rough texts and quotations and copies of webpages. A ‘mess’, one that works for me.

Personal note 2: for me writing has always been an act of keeping up with time. I see it as something that flows. Hence rhythm is very important for me — in writing and reading. I can endlessly listen to jazz, freejazz, free improvisation…

Fiddling around with WordPress, WordPress themes & all that. Haven’t yet published the url of the new blog. Has to be filled first.

I like to keep control — installing new themes is pretty easy, but I want, no, what I need to know is what the structure is. What’s in the css-files, what’s in the php, what the different files do, et cetera. I might not be able to write one line of php, but the least I can do is read through the php-files and understand what’s done where. I might not be very good at stylesheets, but I can copy and change. And that is what I will do.