Digitalia

Hmmm. Dat zijn van die aardige meldingen “U kunt dit programma niet openen omdat de Classic omgeving niet langer wordt ondersteund”. Ja, dat weet ik ook wel, OSX. Gelukkig kun je zo’n oud bestand ook gewoon vanuit BBedit of TextEdit openen.

Ik zocht iets uit 1991 of 1992. Ik heb dat gewoon op mijn laptop staan. Destijds had mijn computer een harddisk van 20MB, dus alles wat daarop paste, past ruimschoots op elke later gekochte computer.

Toch werd ik niet blij toen ik het tekstbestandje opende (in respectievelijk BBedit, TextEdit en OpenOffice). Het ging gewoon open – dat is je geraden, computer! – en de tekst was leesbaar – gelukkig – maar helaas zaten er aan het begin en einde van het bestand en hier en daar tussendoor ‘andere tekens’. Hmmphggrmmbl. Ik wil helemaal niet aan tekstarcheologie doen. Hmmmphgrmbl, had ik er dan 5 jaar geleden toch beter aan gedaan al die tekstbestanden om te zetten naar .txt?

Pfff, ik gebruikte Word 4, en heel soms MacWritePro. Ik zou eens moeten zoeken of ik niet op een bepaald moment alles heb geprint. (Ik meen van wel).

Maar waar het me om gaat: als programma’s uit 1991 al ‘troep’ achterlieten in je bestanden, hoe ontzettend veel ‘troep’ laten de programma’s die we nu gebruiken dan wel niet achter? Heel veel dus. Als je over 20 jaar nog wil lezen wat je vandaag schrijft…

nl,software,writing | February 15, 2011 | 17:32 | Comments Off on Digitalia |

Benjamin Gaulon: RES

I met Benjamin Gaulon when he was a student at the MA Interactive Media & Environments in Groningen. I was teaching there. His graduation work was the RES, a multi-player musical instrument using the classic Nintendo controllers. It was a highlight of Sonic Acts XII in 2004, and we had much much fun playing it. He’s now based in Dublin and has almost finished a new version, using Arduino, and has released the source code, and will shortly also get the PD code up. So you could build it yourself…

Here’s more info:

http://www.recyclism.com/theresmini.php

And here’s his tumblr-blog: http://adw.tumblr.com/

art,en,free publicity,music,software | February 11, 2011 | 17:12 | Comments Off on Benjamin Gaulon: RES |

Spåm & duimpjes

De WordPress-plugins beschermen goed, of ik ben gewoon, gelukkig, al lang niet meer populair bij de comment-spammers. Alleen dit type glipt er nog wel doorheen:

“There are some interesting points in time on this article but I don’t know if I see all of them heart to heart. There is some validity however I’ll take maintain opinion until I look into it further. Good article , thanks and we would like extra! Added to FeedBurner as well.”

“Aw, this was a very nice post. In thought I want to put in writing like this additionally – taking time and actual effort to make an excellent article… but what can I say… I procrastinate alot and under no circumstances seem to get something done.”

En ze doen hun best! Ze proberen zelfs een WordPress hash-cash mee te sturen.

Het blijft interessant hoe snel een menselijk wezen kan herkennen dat zulk commentaar niet ‘echt’ is. Dat wil zeggen: er is geen menselijke link tussen mijn tekstje en de comment, ook al zijn de commentaren misschien geformuleerd door een mens (en in bulk door spamsoftware verstuurd).

Waarom krijgen internetters (soms) wel een warm gevoel van een stel Facebook-thumbs-up? Omdat er een menselijk moment ‘achter’ zat…

research,software,ubiscribe | February 11, 2011 | 12:45 | Comments Off on Spåm & duimpjes |

A warning from Richard Stallmann

“New cloud computing OS released by Google is plan to push people into ‘careless computing’, warns free software advocate” sez The Guardian. Good piece, here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/dec/14/chrome-os-richard-stallman-warning.

en,software,ubiscribe | December 15, 2010 | 17:40 | Comments Off on A warning from Richard Stallmann |

A few things I’ve been checking out:

Graham Harman’s : The Prince of Networks, Bruno Latour and Metaphysics; Bernhard Stiegler’s Technics and Time (difficult to read); a short list of Simondon’s terminology at Fractal Ontology; and different text-editors for Mac, after reading Jacket’s styleguide, or spot-on long explanation of what the f— it means to edit a text in these times.

en,reading matter,research,software,ubiscribe,writing | March 28, 2010 | 23:17 | Comments Off on — |

___

I love the idea of ‘audience’. I believe in the role of the editor.

en,software,ubiscribe,writing | March 5, 2010 | 11:54 | Comments Off on ___ |

‘Latency’ in Word

The act of writing depends on an immediacy of brain to fingers on keyboard to screen (of brain to fingers on pen to paper). I need to see immediately on screen what my fingers are doing to the keyboard.

That is why I always use a simple editors. TextEdit, Writeroom, BBEdit – oh even WordPress – are functioning fine.

But Word and OpenOffice on a Mac drive me crazy. They are great programs for many reasons (the track changes for instance), but I do not understand how anybody who writes can really work with them. In any case, I cannot deal with the latency between my fingerstrokes and what is shown on screen. It is way to slow. My fingers make corrections while typing based on what I see happening on screen. Why have I never read (or heard) anybody complaining about this? (I imagine the problem does not exist with Word on Windows).

Yes, it is often just a question of a quarter second, but that’s way too much.

I mean – uh – I’m just amazed how such fundamental ‘faults’ are just taken for granted. Believe me Word 4 on a MacSE from 1990 did NOT have this problem. (Same thing with the shiny screen on modern laptops which under most light situations are utterly horrible on the eyes).

en,software,writing | January 17, 2010 | 16:32 | Comments Off on ‘Latency’ in Word |

Back…

Putting data back, re-downloading software, disciplining applications and the general behavior of the computer. I have my MacBook back.

en,software,ubiscribe | November 3, 2009 | 14:07 | Comments Off on Back… |

Baltan Night at Almost Cinema

Last friday I was in Gent, at the Baltan Laboratories Night of the Almost Cinema festival at the Vooruit. (Oops, ugly sentence in – at – of – at, anyway). I was nervous, having to moderate a talk with Edwin van der Heide, Lucas van der Velden, Bas van Koolwijk, Gert-Jan Prins and Tez, previous to 3 performances. Of course it went fine (as others said), and afterwards I could enjoy the 3 performances, having done my job.

First act: the Synchronator played by its creators Gert-Jan Prins and Bas van Koolwijk. This night was actually a kind of ‘premiere’, as the product, a neat box that adds video sync pulses and color coding to an audio input, was for the first time available, and for sale. (The very first one was bought that night by Edwin van der Heide): http://www.synchronator.com. I have seen both playing with previous set-ups before, but I do not remember that I’d ever seen them as duo. Seeing them as a duo adds a lot to the performance, as it is not only a discovery, a dialogue and a struggle between performer and instrument, resulting in sound and images. It doubles it, no squares it, by the dialogue and struggle that goes on between Bas van Koolwijk and Gert-Jan Prins. The audience follows that – and also sees how Bas van Koolwijk is more prone to ‘hook’ onto visual developments, whereas Get-jan Prins more often concentrates on what he finds in the sounds. Top.

The immersive audiovisual composition PV686 of Tez I’d seen and heard in a previous form at Sonic Acts. Here the circumstances were much better, with the four speakers in a square, and our ears on the height of the speakers. In that way the auditory illusion of the binaural beats could be enjoyed to its max, and I was happy to be able to quietly sit through the whole piece, also discovering that I found the use of flicker rather mild. (Normally I’m quick to leave when there’s a heavy use of flicker, I can’t stand strobscopes for a long time, but in PV686, it’s just the screen with slowly changing colors that flickers.) It is a rather meditative piece. I did not find the sound loud, yet some in the audience found it loud. It seemed to me that they interpreted the binaural beats as being ‘loud sounds’.

Edwin van de Heide played his LSP in the large nineteenth-century ‘balzaal’. I’ve seen it at least twice before, but never in a circumstance where I could fully concentrate on his performance. I was enthralled and fascinated this time with how he sculpts spaces with the laser and the colors. It’s SF-like, sure, and it’s the 3D-illusion, it’s like travelling into outer space, seeing the dimensions open up – all of that. But it is subtle, it is not at any moment corny, not at any moment a ‘big laser show’ on a techno party, it’s compositionally precise using all of the previous aspects to create an audiovisual experience that is interesting in itself.

Just a shame that the audience was so small. (On the other hand, that presented for those present an opportunity to enjoy it all without any distraction.)

art,en,music,software | October 16, 2009 | 14:57 | Comments Off on Baltan Night at Almost Cinema |

Manovich: Software Studies

Reading through Lev Manovich new book Software Studies, which is downloadable here: http://lab.softwarestudies.com/2008/11/softbook.html.

Being massively jealous of course (“hey,I could’ve easily written part 3, that’s my research”), I wonder if what Manovich is doing in this book — which at first quick reading through seems to be great as a summary, and very teachable — is in fact first “interface studies” and secondly software studies. Shouldn’t way peel off one more layer, open one more black box to reach at — well, how software is made to function so it makes us function? Or is this criticism due to my fascination for programming — not being a programmer myself?

Naturally their are many smaller issues on which I’m tempted to take issue with Manovich, or where I think he might have missed something. (German media theory?). I wonder if remixability is as central as he claims it to be. Yet, exactly making such a claim — remix as dominant form of cultural production — produces clarity too.

Just as Language of New Media this could be a book that one simply cannot go around / escape, when doing software studies. Even if one’s own approach would be different. (Manovich focussed mainly at American and Americanized culture, less at more marginal software cultures, et cetera et cetera).

Well, this is all very very preliminary, having read Part One, skimmed through Part Two, and read diagonally across Part Three. But I couldn’t resist…

And well, this is a great quote: “In the era of Web 2.0, we can state that information wants to be ASCII.”

en,reading matter,research,software | November 27, 2008 | 22:58 | Comments Off on Manovich: Software Studies |
« Previous PageNext Page »
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License. | Arie Altena