Bonneuil and Fressoz on the Anthropocene

Zelden nog dat ik een boek noem, hier. Deze beveel ik aan (‘bevel tot lezen’). Uitstekende inleiding, samenvatting, stellingname, visie, leesbaar, en gebaseerd op een grote hoeveelheid historisch materiaal. Al in 2013 uitgekomen in het Frans, nu vertaald in het Engels: Bonneuil & Fressoz’ The Shock of the Anthropocene. Uitgegeven door Verso Books.


en,nl,reading matter,research | February 25, 2016 | 12:37 | comments (0) |

Photos of Dark Ecology II

As said, I spent almost a week in Kirkenes, Murmansk, Zapolyarny and Nikel, travelling on the second Dark Ecology journey with many, many great people. A first set of photos can be found here, more to come:

art,en,research | December 3, 2015 | 17:10 | comments (0) |

RWM Objecthood podcast

I sat down a week and a half ago and talked for 32 minutes about the Kola Superdeep to a microphone, sent it to Roc Jiménez de Cisneros of Radio Web Macba and he edited it to include about 15 minutes (I’m told) in this podcast: RWM Macba Objecthood 4.

art,en,free publicity,research | December 3, 2015 | 17:06 | comments (0) |

Kirkenes podcast

I totally missed this 15 November BBC Worldservice programme on Kirkenes, explaining the political situation: Norway-Russia: An Arctic Friendship Under Threat. (Though this was prior to the closing of the border for refugees, and prior to the bankruptcy of the mine).

en,history,research | December 3, 2015 | 16:58 | comments (0) |

Incoming – No Patent Pending, self-made performative media

Prachtige uitgave, kreeg het opgestuurd, moet het meeste nog lezen, en kijk daar naar uit: want bijdrages van Ewen Chardronnet, Evelina Domnitch & Dmitry Gelfand, Lars Kynde, Alessandro Ludovico, Matteo Marangoni, Jonathan Reus, Joel Ryan & Kristina Andersen, Dieter Vandoren, Anne Wellmer, Godfried-Willem Raes, en Yolanda Uriz.



en,music,nl,reading matter,research,software | March 28, 2015 | 10:07 | comments (0) |

Dark Ecology, attempt at a reading list

eflyer_Dark Ecology_9-12 October 2014

Initially I had the idea to make a short reading list for the Dark Ecology project. A couple of articles, a few interviews, maybe an online lecture that together offer an introduction to the theme. A bit like a syllabus for a graduate seminar. But the journey is not conceived as a graduate seminar, and I’m not a professor teaching a course. Therefore instead of a syllabus, I have made an overview of some of the theories, ideas, philosophical directions and books that have guided my thinking for ‘Dark Ecology’. It’s not exhaustive – and probably anyone can think of an important book or a theoretical approach that’s dearly missing from this overview. The overview contains pointers to books and online resources, and is ‘spiced’ up with a few provocative or informative quotes from the mentioned books.

Timothy Morton: Dark Ecology

We have indeed borrowed the term ‘Dark Ecology’ from the work of Timothy Morton. Over the past couple of years he has written a number of books outlining an ‘Ecological Thought’ that has no use for the Romantic notion of ‘Nature’. He begins to explain this idea in Ecology without Nature (2007) – a book which is also about art and ‘environmental aesthetics. In The Ecological Thought (2010) he shows that the ‘ecological thought’ is not nice and green and a celebration of all things natural, but that to really think the interconnectedness of all forms of life and all things (the ‘mesh’), is dark. ‘Dark ecology puts hesitation, uncertainty, irony, and thoughtfulness back into ecological thinking. The form of dark ecology is that of noir film. The noir narrator begins investigating a supposedly external situation, from a supposedly neutral point of view, only to discover that she or he is implicated in it. The point of view of the narrator herself becomes stained with desire. There is no metaposition from which we can make ecological pronouncements. Ironically, this applies in particular to the sunny, affirmative rhetoric of environmental ideology. A more honest ecological art would linger in the shadowy world of irony and difference. …The ecological thought includes negativity and irony, ugliness and horror.’ In Realist Magic (2013) Morton sides with Object Oriented Ontology, and particularly with the ideas of the American philosopher Graham Harman, to further explain how we can conceive of the world. He continues this trajectory in Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World (2014). In this book he explains what a hyperobject is (global warming is an hyperobject), and what the ‘end of the world’ means for philosophy. Here are three quotes from this last book: ‘But there is no “away” after the end of the world. It would make more sense to design in a dark ecological way, admitting our coexistence with toxic substances we have created and exploited.’ And: ‘Hyperobjects are directly responsible for what I call the end of the world, rendering both denialism and apocalyptic environmentalism obsolete.’ And: ‘For what comes into view for humans at this moment is precisely the end of the world, brought about by the encroachment of hyperobjects, one of which is assuredly Earth itself, and its geological cycles demand a geophilosophy that doesn’t think simply in terms of human events and human significance.’ And as I am busy quoting, here’s another long one from Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World that partly summarises Morton’s philosophy: ‘There are objects: cinnamon, microwaves, interstellar particles and scarecrows. There is nothing underneath objects. Or, better, there is not even nothing underneath them. There is no such thing as space independent of objects (happily contemporary physics agrees). What is called Universe is a large object that contains objects such as black holes and racing pigeons. Likewise there is no such thing as an environment: wherever we look for it, we find all kinds of objects—biomes, ecosystems, hedges, gutters and human flesh. In a similar sense, there is no such thing as Nature. I’ve seen penguins, plutonium, pollution and pollen. But I’ve never seen Nature (I capitalize the word to reinforce a sense of its deceptive artificiality).’

Morton’s Realist Magic is available online: Through Morton’s blog you can also find a number of his lectures and seminars:, his youtube-page with lectures is here:

Bruno Latour: Politics of Nature (2004) and AIME (2013)
in his book Politics of Nature (2004) Bruno Latour also defines an ecology without the notion of ‘Nature’. In this book he states ‘if “nature” is what makes it possible to recapitulate the hierarchy of beings in a single ordered series, political ecology is always manifested, in practice, by the destruction of the idea of nature.’ (p. 25). The idea of nature that political ecology has to let go of is the result of a political division that puts the indisputable and objective on one side, and the subjective and disputable things on the other. According to Latour, we have to escape from that division to be able to make a common world. The issue is rather to find out how humans are ever more and ever more intimately attached to a panoply of non-human natures. This idea is – for me – the core of the Dark Ecology project. Latour’s most recent book – and webplatform – An Inquiry into Modes of Existence (2013) is an ambitious attempt how to compose such a common world. It starts from this cue: ‘Not so long ago, the project that would have seen modernization spread over the whole planet came up against unexpected opposition from the planet itself. Should we give up, deny the problem, or grit our teeth and hope for a miracle? Alternatively we could inquire into what this modern project has meant so as to find out how it can be begun again on a new footing.’ It’s not an easy book, as it challenges you to conceive differently of a lot of ideas that have guided western thought since Modern times. The English webplatform of AIME is accessible at, a lot of Latour’s articles and video lectures are available at

Michel Serres: Times of Crisis (2009) and Biogea (2012)

Times of Crisis is a short book by Michel Serres explaining his ideas of the new relationship between humans and the world, which leads to a new science and a new society. The English translation is from 2014, the French original from 2009. He writes: ‘The term anthropocene means nothing else: we used to think of ourselves as the individual or collective subjects of a passive object, the world. Reversal: we become the objects of the new subject Biogea.’ (p. 47) And: ‘An immense era of our history is ending; furthermore, the time of our hominescence begins. Our past will not help us much to dialogue with our new Biogean partner, whose immanence requires a new science, new behaviors and another society.’ (p. 48) Biogea could be seen as Serres’ autobiography. He focuses on the relationship between Earth and human, and how the Earth speaks to the human. It is an almost novelistic account of his idea of ‘biogea’. It is interesting and highly readable – unless you can’t stand Serres’ particular mix of autobiography, poetry, myth, science and philosophy. Info on Times of Crisis:, and on Biogea:

OOO – Object-Oriented Ontology
The ideas of several other ‘OOO’-philosophers and theorists – apart from Timothy Morton – are also relevant in relation to Dark Ecology. OOO posits a world that does not prioritise the human perspective, and philosophically attempts to take into account a world prior to humans. I particularly like the work of Graham Harman, for instance Guerrilla Metaphysics (2005), Prince of Networks (2009), and Weird Realism (2012). There is a plethora of OOO-related discussions online, as many of the OOO-philosophers blog regularly and passionately. The publications by Urbanomic, particularly the issues of their magazine Collapse, are an excellent starting point if you have missed it all:

Elizabeth Ellsworth & Jamie Kruse: Making the Geologic Now (2012)
A collection of theoretical text with examples from art and design, this book is definitely an inspiration for thinking about the convergence of the human and the geologic, and about art for the Antropocene. Ellsworth & Kruse are, and they run the blog Friends of the Pleistocene: An interview with them on nuclear waste and the vastness of geologic time can be found here: You can download Making the Geologic Now at:, or consult the interactive webbook:

Jan Zalasiewicz & others: ‘The Anthropocene, A new Epoch of Geological Time?’ (2011)
The idea of the Antropocene has very quickly gained a lot of support. Here is one of the definite scientific articles outlining why we should indeed conceive of the Antropocene as a new geological era:

Laurence Smith: The New North (2011)
In the past few years quite a number of books describe the Earth from a future perspective. Alan Weisman’s The World without Us (2007) is a journalistic account of what the world will look like without human presence. Jan Zalasiewics’ The Earth After Us (2008) describes what legacy humans leave in the rock, from the viewpoint of an alien civilisation one hundred million year in the future – it’s also a way of explaining what geology is doing. In The New North geographer Laurence Smith describes the Arctic in 2050, and how global warming will affect its economy and geopolitics. In Smith’ account Kirkenes becomes a major hub in the economic network. Two reviews: &

Arie Altena: Kirkenes – Nikel – Zapolyarny – Murmansk, (2013)
My own travelogue and report of the short 2013 journey to Kirkenes, Nikel, Zapolyarny and Murmansk:

Arie Altena

art,en,quotations,reading matter,research | October 6, 2014 | 11:40 | comments (0) |

Kola Superdeep

Online sinds een paar minuten:

en,history,nl,reading matter,research | September 25, 2014 | 13:26 | comments (0) |



1930. Via:

art,research,ubiscribe | September 9, 2014 | 13:05 | comments (0) |

Dark Ecology in the Barents Observer

Finally, I’m in the Barents Observer – a pre-announcement of the Dark Ecology-project:


The Dark Ecology team scouting locations, (from left to right) Annette Wolfsberger, Hilde Methi, Arie Altena and Guro Vrålstad . (Photo: Michael Miller)

art,en,free publicity,research | September 1, 2014 | 11:33 | comments (0) |

Jonathan Crary: 24/7

Nog een boek dat al tijden lag te wachten om gelezen te worden. Ik was het alweer bijna vergeten. Jonathan Crary’s 24/7: Late Capitalism and the Ends of Sleep. Gisteren gelezen. Tja, hij heeft natuurlijk volkomen gelijk in zijn schets van het 24/7-tijdsparadigma. Maar de manifeststijl (alles is een karakterisering van 24/7 en de uitwerking ervan) maakt het boekje ook eenzijdig. Het is nogal, euh, apodictisch? Is dat het juiste woord? Andere noemen het ‘provocatief’ en ‘polemisch’. Ik denk: ah, het klopt allemaal, (en daarmee klopt het eigenlijk nu al niet meer), maar het mist nuance – met meer nuance krijg je een rijker boek. Voorbeelden van andere tijdsregimes, praktische voorbeelden vooral. Ook van hoe mensen hun tijd indelen. Ritme geven, of ritme ontkennen. Dat zou het rijker maken (in plaats van weer een analyse van Marker’s La Jetee). Ook in politieke stellingname is het, hmm, wat aan de simpele kant. De simpele versie van de linkse kritiek op het 24/7 neoliberale denken – een analyse die ik grotendeels deel, maar dus, hmm, ook in deze vorm te simpel vind. En laat ik het zo zeggen: het boekje brengt mij weinig nieuws – maar dat is grotendeels omdat ik de lijnen die hij samenbrengt, al uit en te na ken. Dat is dus geen kritiek, het boekje biedt een uitstekende, pakkende samenvatting. En dus een perfect beginpunt voor wie al die lijnen nog niet kent. Want Crary’s analyse van hoe kapitalisme, ons economsiche systeem en het tijdsregime van 24/7 de samenleving tot in de poriën verandert, deugt ondertussen wel degelijk. (En de verbanden met mediatechnologie). Eerste hoofdstuk is overigens het best.

(En ja, ik ben altijd een tegenstander van de 24/7 ideologie geweest. Ik vind nog altijd dat we er goed aan zouden doen om winkels en bedrijven op zondag verplicht te sluiten. Ik weet ook dat toen de zondagsopenstelling van winkels een politiek item was in Nederland, ik in mijn omgeving de enige was – oh, en mn moeder – die daarop tegen was). (Enzovoort, enzoverder).



« Previous PageNext Page »
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License. | Arie Altena